SAM™ Sustainment Intelligence — Executive Demonstration Edition
SAM™
Mission Decision Intelligence Operating System
ILLUSTRATIVE DATA
STEP 01 / 06Mission Context

A special-operations wing with a mission it cannot miss

The 417th Special Operations Sustainment Group supports a forward-deployed AC-130J squadron. In 72 hours, four aircraft must be mission-capable for Operation STEADFAST HORIZON. SAM maintains a live decision picture across maintenance, supply, and mission planning.

AFT RAMP ACTUATOR SUPPORT — NSN 1560-01-583-2247 AC-130J · TAIL 24-5573 · PLAN VIEW · ILLUSTRATIVE

Mission board

T-72:00 TO LAUNCH
OperationSTEADFAST HORIZON
Aircraft required4 × AC-130J
Aircraft mission-capable3 of 4
Tail 24-5573 statusNMCS — supply
Fleet readiness82%
Decision authorityWing Commander
STEP 02 / 06Disruption Detected

One cracked bracket. A supplier line down. 72 hours.

A post-flight inspection finds a cracked aft ramp actuator support on tail 24-5573. Standard resupply fails: the sole-source supplier line is halted and depot stock is zero. SAM detects the collision between the maintenance event and the supply disruption in seconds — not days.

Disruption timeline

AUTO-CORRELATED

Impact assessment

SAM · LIVE
Standard lead time (NSN 1560-01-583-2247)41 days
Depot stock — all echelons0 units
Supplier line statusHALTED — QA escape
Mission impact if unresolved3-ship launch · −25% effect
Projected fleet readiness74% and falling
STEP 03 / 06AI Correlation — Synthetic Workforce

Four governed agents work the problem in parallel

SAM's synthetic workforce fans out under policy: every query is authorized by the policy decision point, every action lands in the append-only audit ledger, and no agent acts beyond its autonomy tier. The knowledge graph below is live — select any node.

Knowledge graph

SELECT A NODE

Every edge is evidence-linked. Classification-bounded traversal means each audience sees only what policy allows.

Synthetic-agent activity

AUDIT-LEDGERED
STEP 04 / 06Geometric Intelligence — Physna

When the part number fails, the geometry doesn't

SAM invokes Physna geometric search: instead of matching part numbers, it matches the shape itself against millions of indexed models. A structurally equivalent bracket — different NSN, different program — is sitting in a depot 400 miles away.

FAILED PART · SCAN CANDIDATE MATCH
Geometric similarity0.0%

Match results

PHYSNA · GEOMETRIC SEARCH
NSN 1560-01-604-8812
C-130J ramp actuator support, Blk 8.1 · Depot: Warner Robins · Qty 6
99.2%
CAD-AM-2247-R2
Additive-manufacture candidate · engineering disposition req'd
98.4%
NSN 1560-01-577-1904
Legacy H-model variant · requires shim mod · Qty 14
96.8%
Why this matters
The 99.2% match is form-fit-function equivalent per engineering data, already certified on the same airframe family, and physically in stock. Part-number search alone would never have found it.
STEP 05 / 06Decision Support — Explainable Recommendation

Three courses of action. One recommendation. Full provenance.

SAM simulates each course of action against mission timing, cost, and risk — then explains itself. Every figure traces to evidence; every assumption is declared. The machine advises. The commander decides.

COA-1 · Expedite OEM

Emergency restart of supplier line, premium freight
Time to MC±19 days
Cost$412K
Mission riskMisses launch
58%
SAM RECOMMENDS

COA-2 · Geometric substitute

Pull NSN -8812 from Warner Robins, LM design-authority disposition, install
Time to MC31 hours
Cost$38K
Mission riskLaunch protected
94%

COA-3 · Cannibalize

Cross-deck from training tail 24-5561
Time to MC22 hours
Cost2nd tail down
Mission riskReadiness debt
71%

Why SAM recommends COA-2

EXPLAINABILITY · EVIDENCE-LINKED
Where did the data come from?
Maintenance record MX-77412, supplier EDI feed, depot inventory API, Physna geometric index. 14 evidence artifacts, all cited.
What alternatives were weighed?
3 COAs × 2,000 Monte Carlo runs each. COA-2 protects launch in 94% of runs; COA-1 in 6%; COA-3 in 88% but carries fleet readiness debt.
What assumptions were made?
Depot release within 6 hrs of approval; ground transport 9 hrs; LM design-authority disposition inside 8 hrs per teaming SLA; install per TO 1C-130J-3. Each assumption is flagged and monitored.
STEP 06 / 06Command Decision — Human Authority

The commander decides. SAM executes. The ledger remembers.

SAM never self-approves. The commander may take the recommendation — or overrule it. Either way the decision passes a two-gate authority chain, is signed into the append-only ledger, and only then do execution workflows fire. Try any course of action: the outcome model follows the commander's call.

Authority gate

TWO-GATE · HUMAN COMMAND OWNERSHIP
MXG/CC — RecommendGroup commander concurrence
→
Wing Commander — ApproveRelease authority for execution
Course of action

Leadership decision package

AUTO-GENERATED ON APPROVAL
  • One-page executive decision brief
  • Evidence appendix — 14 cited artifacts
  • COA comparison with simulation traces
  • Signed audit-ledger extract
  • Execution order & monitored-assumption watchlist

Mission outcome

T-00:00 · LAUNCH WINDOW
82% FLEET READINESS
0h
Grounded → MC
$0K
Cost avoided
0/4
Aircraft launched
The closing line
A 41-day supply failure became a 31-hour recovery — because SAM correlated the disruption instantly, Physna found what part numbers couldn't, and a human commander stayed in charge of every consequential decision.
CLOSINGPartnership Ask — Supply & Logistics

Put SAM inside the Supply & Logistics team

Everything you just watched worked because the OEM was in the decision chain. Security 2.0 is requesting a working session with Lockheed Martin Supply Chain & Logistics leadership to formalize that role — a seat on the team, bringing governed decision intelligence to C-130J-family sustainment.

What Security 2.0 brings

CAPABILITY
  • SAM™ — Mission Decision Intelligence Operating System: governed AI, append-only audit ledger, human command ownership
  • Physna geometric-intelligence teaming — the part-discovery capability demonstrated today
  • SDVOSB and SBA-certified Small Disadvantaged Business — supplier-diversity and set-aside value on team bids
  • Top Secret facility clearance — ready for cleared sustainment work
  • Active Navy SBIR and DAF D2P2 pipeline with Lockheed Martin already on the team

The ask

DECISION REQUESTED
  • A seat for Security 2.0 on the Supply & Logistics team
  • A 90-day pilot: SAM sustainment intelligence on one C-130J-family sustainment cell
  • A named LM engineering point of contact for the disposition workflow shown today
  • A path to a definitized teaming instrument following pilot results

Next step

WITHIN 30 DAYS
  • Working meeting with Supply Chain & Logistics leadership
  • Security 2.0 brings: pilot plan, data-interface specification, draft statement of work
  • Success criteria agreed up front — measured the way this demonstration measured itself
Dr. James Hall · CEO
Security 2.0, Inc. · Mesa, AZ
CAGE 9UY57 · SDVOSB · SDB